Because of The City's lack of low-income housing, 47 percent of ex-offenders are left to live on the streets.
Competition for housing in San Francisco goes far beyond eager twenty-somethings searching for the perfect pad in the Marina.
According to a report released by the Board of Supervisors, more than 47 percent of ex-offenders are left without permanent housing in The City.
Many of these former inmates have been released as a result of Gov. Jerry Brown’s infamous realignment efforts, which are meant to reduce prison overcrowding but is creating a demand that San Francisco low-income housing cannot meet.
Ex-offenders on probation or parole are legally required to live in San Francisco, so they have nowhere to go except the street. This creates a vicious cycle, says a senior manager at the city’s Budget and Legislative Analyst’s Office, Severin Campbell. He told the Chronicle:
“You may be an ex-offender, but to San Francisco you’re just one of the homeless. But homelessness makes it easier to re-offend.”
As of last October, there were 5,818 ex-offenders under the supervision of the city’s Adult Probation Department, according to the Chronicle. Of the 5,818 ex-offenders, 417 were released under the state’s new realignment program, AB 109.
The city sets aside a mere 250 rooms for ex-inmates (many of them with a limited stay time of a month or less), so you do the math.
Not to mention, AB 109 is all about “realigning” less-serious felony offenders from the state to local level, so many of these people have a criminal record.
Unsurprisingly, that makes securing housing all the more difficult for former prisoners and all the more controversial for the thousands of low-income San Franciscans without a record who are competing for the same housing.
The Chronicle reported that the city has already established that discrimination on the basis of criminal background is a major housing issue and aims to prevent such discrimination. But without additional housing, the problem persists.
The Board of Supervisors’ report suggested one solution – moving ex-offenders to other counties when possible – but offered no input from other California counties or suggestion for how they might receive that idea.
Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi told the Chronicle:
“Housing is a critical issue for ex-offenders, and it’s a very vexing problem for San Francisco.”
If the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Drakes Bay's final appeal to stay open, oyster prices might...
A newly proposed bill would require universities to have polling places available on campus.
